
Dying dogs are not art. Actively participating in the death of an animal cannot be considered art. Why? Because anything you could potentially serve time for should not be rewarded. Next up criminal defense attorneys will be using art as the reason for defending their murderous clients.
"Your honor, esteemed members of the jury, sure my client stabbed his ex-wife 31 times but really it was just artistic expression not premeditated murder. Would you lock up Da Vinci if he had stabbed Lisa Gherardini? I don't think so."

If I take a dump in a bag, poke holes in it and then proceed to spin around in a circle slanging feces around the room would I be considered an artist? What if I took a homeless man and chained him to a wall to die? Art? I fucking hope not.
When I think of art I think Bob Ross (that soothing voice always got me), landscapes, sculptures, paintings, drawings etc. Unfortunately animal sacrifices never made that list. In all the art classes I ever took I can't remember starving things as one of lessons. You can have your dead animals, I'll take still life's of a bowl filled with fruit.

Bottom line, if you disagree with my interpretation of art don't invite me to your openings. And if anyone needs a nude model hit me up!









